Hi Gerhard,

just one question.
The "View" name is currently used for all the functions but NOT for @Page,
@PageBean or @PageParameter.
Wouldn't it be better to call them @View... too?

Regards,
Thomas

2012/11/2 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>

> hi @ all,
>
> i pushed a first draft for DELTASPIKE-288.
> i started with the original api provided by codi and improved (+ prepared)
> some parts based on a short discussion with brian and mark.
>
> as soon as we have the final api and spi, i'll start with the final
> integration with jsf.
>
> right now we have the first steps for:
>  - type-safe config and navigation (+ event)
>  - folder support
>  - new meta-model which allows to change the meta-data during the
> bootstrapping process. (it's the basis for the final (fixed) meta-data
> representation.)
>  - @Page and @Folder are optional (they get added dynamically during the
> bootstrapping process, if they aren't in place)
>  - no conceptual difference between meta-data provided by the framework and
> custom meta-data
>  - no conceptual difference between callbacks provided by the framework and
> custom callbacks
>  - view-config meta-data from codi (e.g.: @PageBean and @PageParameter)
>  - callbacks from codi (e.g.: @PreRenderView and @Secured)
>  - (optional) helpers from codi for manual/dynamic use-cases (e.g.:
> ViewNavigationHandler and PageParameterContext)
>
> there are still a lot of todos and some parts which aren't implemented.
> since there are a lot of constellations we have to support, i'll start a
> step-by-step discussion next week.
> you are welcome to look at the current api + spi as well as the use-cases +
> tests i've pushed (to see the basic direction).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>

Reply via email to