hi thomas, yes - i did it already in a local branch. i planned to push it after a 2nd review of the new approach. (we need the window-context from mark to finish the missing parts and i would like to finish them before the 2nd review.)
regards, gerhard 2013/2/14 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > Hi Gerhard, > > any news about this? > Will the names be changed for the 0.4 release? > > Regards, > Thomas > > 2012/11/13 Brian Leathem <[email protected]> > > > +1 These name seem fine to me. > > > > Brian > > > > > > On 12-11-11 06:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > > > >> hi @ all, > >> > >> it would be great to get feedback about the names (used in the api) we > >> have > >> right now. > >> as mentioned by thomas, we could align some of them - e.g.: > >> > >> @View -> @ViewRef > >> @Page -> @View > >> @PageBean -> @ViewControllerBean > >> @PrePageAction -> PreViewAction > >> @PageParameter -> @NavigationParameter > >> PageParameterContext -> NavigationParameterContext > >> > >> while discussing the names, i'll start to write the documentation for > the > >> api and spi which allows us to get a shared perception for the next step > >> of > >> the discussion. > >> > >> regards, > >> gerhard > >> > >> > >> > >> 2012/11/2 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > >> > >> ok, great :) > >>> > >>> 2012/11/2 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> hi thomas, > >>>> > >>>> that's one of the first topics i would like to discuss next week. > >>>> (i just imported them with the same name to avoid confusion). > >>>> > >>>> we could rename @View e.g. to @ViewRef and @Page to @View (and > >>>> @PageParameter e.g. to @ViewParameter) > >>>> however, @ViewParameter might be a bit misleading. > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> gerhard > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2012/11/2 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> Hi Gerhard, > >>>>> > >>>>> just one question. > >>>>> The "View" name is currently used for all the functions but NOT for > >>>>> > >>>> @Page, > >>>> > >>>>> @PageBean or @PageParameter. > >>>>> Wouldn't it be better to call them @View... too? > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Thomas > >>>>> > >>>>> 2012/11/2 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>> hi @ all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> i pushed a first draft for DELTASPIKE-288. > >>>>>> i started with the original api provided by codi and improved (+ > >>>>>> > >>>>> prepared) > >>>>> > >>>>>> some parts based on a short discussion with brian and mark. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> as soon as we have the final api and spi, i'll start with the final > >>>>>> integration with jsf. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> right now we have the first steps for: > >>>>>> - type-safe config and navigation (+ event) > >>>>>> - folder support > >>>>>> - new meta-model which allows to change the meta-data during the > >>>>>> bootstrapping process. (it's the basis for the final (fixed) > >>>>>> > >>>>> meta-data > >>> > >>>> representation.) > >>>>>> - @Page and @Folder are optional (they get added dynamically > during > >>>>>> > >>>>> the > >>>> > >>>>> bootstrapping process, if they aren't in place) > >>>>>> - no conceptual difference between meta-data provided by the > >>>>>> > >>>>> framework > >>> > >>>> and > >>>>> > >>>>>> custom meta-data > >>>>>> - no conceptual difference between callbacks provided by the > >>>>>> > >>>>> framework > >>> > >>>> and > >>>>> > >>>>>> custom callbacks > >>>>>> - view-config meta-data from codi (e.g.: @PageBean and > >>>>>> > >>>>> @PageParameter) > >>> > >>>> - callbacks from codi (e.g.: @PreRenderView and @Secured) > >>>>>> - (optional) helpers from codi for manual/dynamic use-cases (e.g.: > >>>>>> ViewNavigationHandler and PageParameterContext) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> there are still a lot of todos and some parts which aren't > >>>>>> > >>>>> implemented. > >>> > >>>> since there are a lot of constellations we have to support, i'll > >>>>>> > >>>>> start > >>> > >>>> a > >>>> > >>>>> step-by-step discussion next week. > >>>>>> you are welcome to look at the current api + spi as well as the > >>>>>> > >>>>> use-cases + > >>>>> > >>>>>> tests i've pushed (to see the basic direction). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> regards, > >>>>>> gerhard > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >
