I see that libgcc_... is now present in /usr/bin on the 11 Jan build and (as always) it executes on the 32-bit Vista box I have access to. No progress with LilyPond though - do you have an idea about how to fix this?
Richard On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 12:05 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > I will look into compiling it statically. I saw that it was compiled > and installed but it was not packaged up when creating the mingw > binary. I wrote a few lines in the routine for creating the mingw > package to copy the two files into the temp file it creates before > zipping it all up. It is building now. > > > It could have also been caused by my removing the lilypond depenedency > for gub. This way it does not build the lilypond that was crashing > anyway. Do you still want to copy the entire lilypond folder over? > > > Jeremiah > > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Richard Shann > <[email protected]> wrote: > Follow-up Comment #1, bug #46868 (project denemo): > > I've looked in the 28th Jan zip file and the gcc_s... dll > library is present > in the bin directory. > Both this and the later zip versions all run fine on a 32-bit > Windows Vista > machine, so I'm not sure why some machines need it and some > don't. I found a > link to this subject > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12921911/mingw-libgcc-s-sjlj-1-dll-is-missing > which seems to indicate two possibilities - either a flag > needed at link time > or a switch from 64 bit to 32 bit mingw compiler. > Here are the relevant bits: > > You have to use -static-libgcc while compiling with mingw’s g > ++ to elemenate > the dependacy on LIBGCC_S_SJLJ-1.DLL. You can do that by > adding static-libgcc > to the linker flags. > > I found this info in this post: > > http://www.qtcentre.org/threads/39639-MinGW-w64-dependency-on-LIBGCC_S_SJLJ-1-DLL > > thanks for the link, that wasn't my problem but i saw in the > link, that this > description is for mingw 64. this pointed me in the right > direction. i > compiled the program using the 32 bit mingw compiler instead > of the 64 bit > compiler. > > _______________________________________________________ > > Reply to this item at: > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46868> > > _______________________________________________ > Message sent via/by Savannah > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Denemo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > > _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
