On Jan 12, 2016 2:46 AM, "Richard Shann" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 00:35 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > > Do you want me to compile LilyPond? We may be able to debug what is > > going on. If we copy the LilyPond directory, we would add about 50mb > > to the zip file. If we know what essential files that would need > > copying over we could go that route also. I could not get it to > > execute denemo in wine for some reason. I will have to try it again. > > What do you suggest? > I wonder if the build machine should be running lilydev (as this would > leverage the effort the LilyPond folk put in to maintain an environment > that builds LilyPond).
I think lilydev is too old for our needs. Even the LilyPond people working on gun have moved to the latest 64 bit ubuntu. >I didn't realize you weren't building LilyPond - > how is the current zip file created? > I stopped building it when there were reports of it crashing. I left it out because I thought you were going to create a script to copy the official LilyPond files over. I can have gub compile it again it may be something trivial to fix if I only knew what was causing the crash. I commented out LilyPond cairo as a dependency of Denemo. That means gub does not compile it. Creating the zip file is just a script that creates a directory with the root prefix of the Denemo directory and a .bat file added to execute it. I don't think the official LilyPond is compiled with cairo support. When we compiled denemo we have it compiled with cairo support. I am not sure if this is needed or why it is needed if so. It could be crashing just from missing a file. I notice if all the files from /etc are not there it will crash. I don't know if that is the case or not when we compile LilyPond. Jeremiah > Richard > > > > > Jeremiah > > > > On Jan 11, 2016 1:14 PM, "Richard Shann" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > I see that libgcc_... is now present in /usr/bin on the 11 Jan > > build and > > (as always) it executes on the 32-bit Vista box I have access > > to. No > > progress with LilyPond though - do you have an idea about how > > to fix > > this? > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 12:05 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > > > I will look into compiling it statically. I saw that it was > > compiled > > > and installed but it was not packaged up when creating the > > mingw > > > binary. I wrote a few lines in the routine for creating the > > mingw > > > package to copy the two files into the temp file it creates > > before > > > zipping it all up. It is building now. > > > > > > > > > It could have also been caused by my removing the lilypond > > depenedency > > > for gub. This way it does not build the lilypond that was > > crashing > > > anyway. Do you still want to copy the entire lilypond folder > > over? > > > > > > > > > Jeremiah > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Richard Shann > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Follow-up Comment #1, bug #46868 (project denemo): > > > > > > I've looked in the 28th Jan zip file and the > > gcc_s... dll > > > library is present > > > in the bin directory. > > > Both this and the later zip versions all run fine on > > a 32-bit > > > Windows Vista > > > machine, so I'm not sure why some machines need it > > and some > > > don't. I found a > > > link to this subject > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12921911/mingw-libgcc-s-sjlj-1-dll-is-missing > > > which seems to indicate two possibilities - either a > > flag > > > needed at link time > > > or a switch from 64 bit to 32 bit mingw compiler. > > > Here are the relevant bits: > > > > > > You have to use -static-libgcc while compiling with > > mingw’s g > > > ++ to elemenate > > > the dependacy on LIBGCC_S_SJLJ-1.DLL. You can do > > that by > > > adding static-libgcc > > > to the linker flags. > > > > > > I found this info in this post: > > > > > http://www.qtcentre.org/threads/39639-MinGW-w64-dependency-on-LIBGCC_S_SJLJ-1-DLL > > > > > > thanks for the link, that wasn't my problem but i > > saw in the > > > link, that this > > > description is for mingw 64. this pointed me in the > > right > > > direction. i > > > compiled the program using the 32 bit mingw compiler > > instead > > > of the 64 bit > > > compiler. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > Reply to this item at: > > > > > > <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46868> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Message sent via/by Savannah > > > http://savannah.gnu.org/ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Denemo-devel mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
