Am 13.08.2017 um 10:10 schrieb Andreas Schneider: > Am 12.08.2017 um 20:33 schrieb Richard Shann: >> On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 19:07 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote: >>> Working on a score in which some measures are still without notes, I >>> encounter an asynchronous playback, i.e. during playback some staffs lag >>> one measure behind the others. This is illustrated in the attached >>> screenshot. Notes from one measure sound together with notes from the >>> next measure from other staffs, which is not so good for checking it. >> >> The problem is that the first measure is not empty - it contains the >> repeat start directive, so it is *not* filled with a space, as Denemo >> does not know what that directive is doing. Empty measures must be truly >> empty if you want Denemo to tacitly insert a whole measure rest. If you >> put a whole measure rest in the first measure, all is well. > > What does that mean in general? That Denemo plays back as the music is > exported, e.g., to lilypond? I had expected Denemo to play back as shown > in the editor, not taking into account directives that might skip or > fill anything for the print output. Moreover, as Joe showed, the > playback can also be brought out of sync by incomplete measures. This > may not be what an average user expects, but is in accordance to how > such music is shown in the print output. That behaviour can also be > handy, e.g. for ancient music where notes may extend into the next > "measure", resulting in an overfull and a following underfull measure in > the Denemo editor, but a correctly typeset score in the print and a > correctly sounding playback. The question is: Which behaviour is best > for the majority of use cases?
Our mails have crossed in the ether, Richard has answered most questions already in his last post. Andreas _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list Denemo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
