On XFCE4 it's the 'Window Manager Tweaks > Accessibility > Automatically tile 
windows when moving toward the screen edge' setting, so maybe something like 
"automatic screen tiling" would be a correct description for Linux. I know 
Windows calls the feature "Snap Layouts". I have no idea about other systems, 
I've first seen it on Windows a few years ago, but they might have been copying 
from someone else too. 

To my best knowledge, you can at least disable it everywhere, even Windows.


Ekkor: 2025. október 24. 13:28:51 CEST, Richard Shann <[email protected]> 
írta:
>On Fri, 2025-10-24 at 12:07 +0200, sj wrote:
>> I haven't noticed this from Denemo, but it's probably that's the
>> normal behaviour of XFCE and the Windows 10 WM at least that pulling
>> a window to the top maximises it. Are you sure it's not coming from
>> the window manager?
>
>It was just that it happens on both Windows and the Mate desktop (under
>Debian) so I started to think it might be GTK; but perhaps it's  just
>that the designers are copying each other...
>
>> 
>> Or is it also maximising on programmatic repositioning? I haven't
>> checked anything like that. 
>
>No, nothing like that, just that you can't just happily drag the window
>where you want it without it suddenly maximising on you - you do get a
>little warning admittedly, but it is quite annoying. People probably
>know how to tell the various window managers to give over, but without
>the thing having a name it is difficult to tell...
>sigh!
>Richard
>
>
>> 
>> 
>> Ekkor: 2025. október 24. 11:45:14 CEST, Richard Shann
>> <[email protected]> írta:
>> > While reduction in the clunkiness of Denemo is a hot topic, does
>> > anyone
>> > know what is behind the "feature" whereby positioning a window at
>> > the
>> > top of the screen makes the window maximise?
>> > Denemo suffers from this both on Windows and on Mate Desktop (and I
>> > suspect everywhere else). I suspect it must be a feature of GTK,
>> > but
>> > since the GTK documentation was "improved" it is very difficult to
>> > find
>> > out. To make matters worse, I can't think of a way to describe this
>> > feature succinctly so as to make it the target of an internet
>> > search.
>> > Any ideas?
>> > 
>> > Richard Shann
>> > 
>

Reply via email to