Usage usage usage. We need to start using this stuff (so we get incented to wire in the MD5 stuff, and so forth).
regards Adam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus M. May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Depot Development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 10:16 AM Subject: Re: ArtifactType > Hmm, well. > what do you think should be our next steps? I am not a big writer, so i am > not really a big fan of writing documentation :-) > also the security stuff is nice, but i guess that there are other issues > scratching right now, right? > > > > > > Hello, > > > since my project at work is pretty much live now, i hope that i can > > > spend more time now on depot. > > > right now i have a question concerning the artifactType. There are some > > > :TODO: tags in this. What was the main intend for this class? Should we > > > change this? > > > > Depot has a concept of namespaces (QName stolen from the WS folks) which > > basically allows a name within a URI, identified by a prefix. This is used > > in a bunch of places when a name alone isn't unique. For example say we > > wants the 'depot jars' or the 'depot source' we'd want to have jars:depot > > or > > source:depot both with the name 'depot'. > > > > The main intention of this class is to define a few types (as namespaces), > > for jar or docs or source or ... (hence the todos). Right now we are > > trying > > to get off the ground with jars. > > > > I'd leave the TODOs but I'd not worry about it too much. > > > > regards > > > > Adam > > >
