Hmm, this was the testing stuff I was working on currently. Sorry for the
delay :-(
I do prefer the creation of the testing objects in the test class. And I
definitly agree on your statement in the first mail :-)


Greetz

Markus

> Ok, I see that viewcvs can help me find old code. I can go borrow it
> again.
> 
> Markus, the if the getTextXXXX stuff is ugly I'm game to change it to a
> better set of Mock objects (I just couldn't think of a better way at the
> time). I'll add them back (for now) but then happily work w/ folks to
> clean
> them out of important classes and get them into better places.
> 
> regards
> 
> Adam
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Depot Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 7:40 AM
> Subject: Deleting stuff
> 
> 
> > Folks
> >
> > >From now on can we discuss something before deleting it? I know we had
> some
> > baggage, but I don't think we have much/any left (in Updater, and
> Version
> > I'd like to keep as my problem please).
> >
> > Right now I am trying to get some key unit tests working and I am
> finding
> > that the main Artifact*.getTestXXXX static helper methods appear
> missing.
> I
> > spent a lot of really boring time adding those, and the prospect of
> doing
> it
> > again is seriously disheartening. (SVN is, IMHO, a pain in the rear to
> > recover from, and I don't plan on trying to guess old version numbers to
> > copy over and manually merge from).
> >
> > Please, although I doubt anything more is remaining to be snipped,
> please
> > let's discuss twice, cut once.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Adam
> > --
> > Experience the Unwired Enterprise:
> > http://www.sybase.com/unwiredenterprise
> > Try Sybase: http://www.try.sybase.com
> 

Reply via email to