[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13865441#comment-13865441
]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-4805:
---------------------------------------
Because the database name for Derby as sent with RDBNAM can be the full path
and also includes any attributes for the Derby connection, it ends up being
more than the name length for most database systems. I think there is a need
for it to be larger than 255 bytes. I think though that 1024 should be plenty.
Note: A work around if anything larger is needed can be to set
derby.system.home to handle the first part of the path. This may be desirable
even if under the limit to minimize the RDBNAM since it is sent so frequently.
> Increase the length of the RDBNAM field in the DRDA implementation
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-4805
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4805
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Network Client, Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.7.1.1
> Reporter: Tiago R. Espinha
> Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
> Labels: derby_triage10_9
> Attachments: DERBY_4805_diff_patch1.txt
>
>
> Currently, whenever the client driver is used, there is a limit of 255 bytes
> for the database name. This is defined by the DRDA spec and there has been a
> discussion on the list [1]/[2] as to whether this limit should be raised due
> to the introduction of the new ACR that allows for UTF-8 characters.
> UTF-8 characters can take up to four bytes and this reduces the limit in
> characters dramatically.
> This should be an easy change as there is a codepoint that defines this limit.
> [1] did not work but [2] did
> [1] - http://old.nabble.com/Database-name-length-tt29691419.html
> [2]http://apache-database.10148.n7.nabble.com/Database-name-length-td33182.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
