Agreed - I have had the same reserve but could not really come up with a better name ;)

Although I was thinking of 'ansiAuthorizationMode' (for ANSI authorization mode) or 'ansiAuthoMode'

On 1/10/06, Daniel John Debrunner < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'm still thinking about this 'secureMode' approach and the interaction
with the existing authentication model. One issue I do have is the name
of the attribute, 'secureMode'. I don't believe that the current
grant/revoke syntax makes Derby completely secure, thus this attribute
may mislead people. Note sure I have a better name though. :-(

Dan.


Reply via email to