ansiAuthMode (not AuthoMode) sounds good to me, I agree that there is a
false sense of security around the term secureMode. How secure is
secure? And this is just about authentication and authorization,
necessary but not necessarily sufficient in terms of security.
David
Francois Orsini wrote:
Agreed - I have had the same reserve but could not really come up with a
better name ;)
Although I was thinking of 'ansiAuthorizationMode' (for ANSI
authorization mode) or 'ansiAuthoMode'
On 1/10/06, *Daniel John Debrunner* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I'm still thinking about this 'secureMode' approach and the interaction
with the existing authentication model. One issue I do have is the name
of the attribute, 'secureMode'. I don't believe that the current
grant/revoke syntax makes Derby completely secure, thus this attribute
may mislead people. Note sure I have a better name though. :-(
Dan.
begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
