Hi Deepa,

Thanks for bringing this up. I agree that being able to run JUnit tests on the small device configuration would be a good idea.

Regards,
-Rick

Deepa Remesh wrote:

One thing that would be great is if there was a well defined  way to
have tests handle jvm specific, framework specific or version specific
logic, since there will have to be some replacement for the many
properties in the test harness and the individual test checks for
framework that we have now.

I would also like to know how JUnit tests will map the current test
harness properties. My concern is specifically how to run JUnit tests
with CDC/Foundation/jsr169. I found the following test failing in this
environment: derbyall/derbyall.fail:junitTests/lang/LangSuite.java

The reason is the test uses DerbyJUnitTest.getConnection method which
uses Driver class which is not available in jsr169. For tests which
use the current test harness, ij.startJBMS() method is used to get
connections which handles getting connection on different platforms.
Can we have a similar central method to get connections in the JUnit
harness?

I think it would be good to get JUnit tests running in this
environment before we move more tests.

Thanks,
Deepa

Reply via email to