[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-216?page=comments#action_12364516 ] 

Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-216:
--------------------------------------

I pulled the largeCodeGen test into the largeData suite.  I suppressed the 
exception output for failed cases by default. It varies from run to run and jvm 
to jvm.  There is a boolean PRINT_FAILURE_EXCEPTION that can be turned on for 
debugging.

I am curious.  Is there anyone out there that runs the largeData test from time 
to time?  What are the system requirements?



> expand largeCodeGen.java test
> -----------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-216
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-216
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Sub-task
>   Components: Test
>     Reporter: Kathey Marsden

>
> the largeCodeGen test needs to be expanded to include other cases that 
> genreate large amounts of byte code. 
> For example:
>      large in clause
>      large insert statement that inserts many rows
>      sql statements with large constant values 
> It is best if the verious tests just use a variable that can be bumped higher 
> and higher for testing and if individual cases are isolated.
> Possible approaches, think of ways to make sql statements really big that 
> will take different code paths.
> Look in the code for instances of statementNumHitLimit and create cases that 
> pass through that code.  Those cases may pass but the hope is to get rid of 
> these calls in favor of splitting  the code in a centralized way, so add the 
> tests to largeCodeGen even if they don't fail.
>      

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to