Anurag Shekhar wrote: > I thought of fixing this as part of this patch but I wasn't sure if its > a good idea to mix two issues in > one patch so I have just added comment in Util saying this needs to be > fixed. I will open a jira issue > for this. Once that is fixed Util won't be having any method to create > exception
What's the benefit of having the embedded driver not call the Util.notImplemented() method and thus increasing the footprint for no value? Wouldn't fixing the client's use first make sense? Then the Util.notImplemented() method could remain. Dan.
