[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-999?page=comments#action_12368536 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-999: --------------------------------------------- Does this test provide any value by being in the suites when SUR is not implemented yet? Rather than trying to make it run clean in ibm142, where the problem seem to be related to exceptions we could wait until it passes cleanly testing real functionality. Then the SUR patch that makes the test that runs clean could put it back into a suite. > test SURTest.junit fails with ibm142 > ------------------------------------ > > Key: DERBY-999 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-999 > Project: Derby > Type: Bug > Components: Regression Test Failure > Versions: 10.2.0.0 > Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren > Priority: Minor > Attachments: SURTest.diff, SURTest.out, SURTest.tmpmstr > > The test SURTest.junit fails with ibm142. > I'm attaching the .diff, .out, and . tmpmstr files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
