Thanks, Raman.
Did I ask this before? Do we want to agree upon a "low water mark" for
code coverage and send out a "Quality Regression" email if our testing
coverage falls below that mark? I think this would have a lot of value.
David
Ramandeep Kaur wrote:
Hi All,
I ran code coverage for trunk - svn revision no 390306 with sun jdk131,
sun jdk142, sun jdk15 on Windows 2000, and results are as following:-
*OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY*
Classes: 91% (1122/1232)
Methods: 75% (15585/20815)
Blocks: 73% (484308/663784)
Lines: 73% (99030.4/136438)
*OVERALL STATS SUMMARY*
total packages: 80
total executable files: 1175
total classes: 1232
total methods: 20815
total executable lines: 136438
The zip file CodeCoverageResults_svn390306.zip with code coverage
results will be posted soon on http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/
<http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/> (Thanks to Andrew).
--
Ramandeep Kaur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
