Andreas Korneliussen wrote:
> Anyone can check out the Derby source tree, and build a "derby" with the > GA bit set at any time. If anyone does that, it clearly does not mean > that Derby has gone GA with JDBC4, and that the community is held > legally responsible. It might depend on if they had to "fork" the code to set the GA bit, or if the GA bit was already set in the Derby SVN. The model being proposed is that the GA bit is already set in the Derby SVN, this seems like the Derby community is saying the codeline is GA. Dan.
