Andrew McIntyre wrote: > > For violating the JSPA or the spec evaluation agreement as far as > creating/distributing an implementation, which is where people got the > idea that we couldn't publish a GA version of Derby that had JDBC 4.0 > bits in it. Although it appears we've now determined that Derby has no > obligations with regard to these agreements as to when it can do a > release.
I must have missed that, when was that detemrined? Dan.
