Sanket Sharma wrote: > Just wanted an opinion about JMX implementation to use for Derby. I > have listed the better known implementations below with my comments: [snip] > Comments and opinion will be appriciated.
Sounds like a pluggable JMX implementation would be best, rather than forcing an infrastructure on a derby user. I hope that the JMX stuff is optional, and I can continue to run Derby without any JMX booting or requiring any JMX libraries. Thanks, Dan.
