[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1717?page=all ]

Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-1717.
---------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
    Derby Info:   (was: [Patch Available])

Thanks Kim, this looks like an improvement to me. I added yet another "client / 
server" -> "client/server" change to the patch and committed revision 432771.

> Working With Derby task file twwdactivity4.dita is invalid, results in 
> missing text
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1717
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1717
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
>            Reporter: Kim Haase
>         Assigned To: Kim Haase
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: twwdactivity4.dita.diff, twwdactivity4.html
>
>
> The Working With Derby section 
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/workingwithderby/twwdactivity4.html is 
> missing some text: a coded <title> tag, "Running the client program," 
> disappears from the output.
> This happens because the source file twwdactivity4.dita plays tricks with 
> DITA to try to get three subsections into a task topic, which does not allow 
> subsections. The last of the intended subsection titles fails to appear in 
> the output because it is coded as a second <title> element in an <example>, 
> which can have only one <title>. (Ant warns about this during processing.) 
> And the two titles that do appear are different sizes because one is an 
> example title and the other just a paragraph in bold text. 
> To be valid DITA, this topic should be coded as a three-step task, where each 
> step has a series of substeps. I have taken the liberty of doing this. I have 
> also taken the liberty of correcting the punctuation and syntax problems that 
> I found. I am attaching a proposed patch. It looks pretty hairy because of 
> all the changes, I'm afraid. However, it is now valid DITA and shows the task 
> steps clearly. I am attaching the output that results, for comparison with 
> the original so you can see the substance is the same.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to