On 9/12/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In both cases the current state of the 10.2 branch is left unchanged wrt JDBC 4.0, ie. no removal of JDBC 4.0 from code or documentation. Dan.
If either of these approaches are used, the doc issue needs to be handled carefully. The JDBC 4.0 information will be in the documentation. Even if a statement is put into the Release Notes about this, it is very likely that a user (or 2) will miss the statement about JDBC 4.0 in the Release Notes and run into some problems. Something should also be posted on the Web Pages for Derby as well. I am not entirely comfortable with leaving a feature in the documentation that is not being delivered. If the docs are left as is, then I would prefer a feature release 10.3 when we formally support JDBC 4.0. -- Laura Stewart
