Kathey Marsden wrote:
Lance J. Andersen wrote:perhaps it is worth going back to DRDA and asking them where/how they came up with that class value?I put a query into the one DRDA contact I have but unfortunately he is out for a few weeks. Perhaps Rick knows someone who could answer where class 58 came from.
58 is a valid "implementation-defined subclass" SQLState. All that DRDA has done is defined its own SQL state values that the SQL Standard guarantees it will not use.
Dan.
