Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Lance J. Andersen wrote:
perhaps it is worth going back to DRDA and asking them where/how
they came up with that class value?
I put a query into the one DRDA contact I have but unfortunately he
is out for a few weeks. Perhaps Rick knows someone who could answer
where class 58 came from.
58 is a valid "implementation-defined subclass" SQLState. All that
DRDA has done is defined its own SQL state values that the SQL
Standard guarantees it will not use.
So then what should the relationship be between the 58 class exceptions
and SQLNonTransientConnectionException. Is it wrong for a user to
expect a SQLNonTransientConnectionException to be thrown whenever there
is a bad connection?
Kathey
