Jørgen Løland wrote:
2. About a week ago, Dibyendu Majumdar raised a question about
why the replication modules are placed under services and not
store. Should replication be moved from
org.apache.derby.{iapi|impl}.services.replication to e.g.
org.apache.derby.{iapi|impl}.store.replication, or is it OK to keep
the current placement?
I don't see the replication code falling into services. They are meant
to be low-level, mostly self-contained modules. It seems that
replication has a need for store modules? Is the replication code a
layer on top of store, or integral with the store. If it's a separate
layer then I would suggest its own layer.
org.apache.derby.{iapi|impl}.replication
Dan.
