We have now passed the feature freeze point (2008-03-08 00:00 GMT-12) and I have started to look for a suitable revision from which to cut the branch.
My subversion client reports times using the CET (GMT+1) timezone so if my math is correct all revisions created prior to 2008-03-08 13:00 CET should be on the branch. This means that the earilest revision which can be used for branching is ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r634896 | mikem | 2008-03-08 04:52:19 +0100 (Sat, 08 Mar 2008) | 6 lines DERBY-3456 Clean up comments and adjust newly added code to match style of surrounding code. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ There appears to have been 3 checkins after that: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r634993 | djd | 2008-03-08 17:00:27 +0100 (Sat, 08 Mar 2008) | 1 line DERBY-2109 Minor cleanup of the security code added for system permissions to ch ange methods not to be public, add a minor comment and fix a file header ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r635115 | djd | 2008-03-09 00:56:05 +0100 (Sun, 09 Mar 2008) | 2 lines DERBY-3435 Implements a new test class for the NetworkServerMBean and adds it to the management test suite. All attributes are tested, although testing of the a ctual attribute values could be improved (see code comments). Attribute names an d return types are always tested. Contributed by John H. Embretsen Email: John dot Embretsen at Sun dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r635183 | kahatlen | 2008-03-09 08:33:41 +0100 (Sun, 09 Mar 2008) | 16 lines DERBY-2911: Implement a buffer manager using java.util.concurrent classes DERBY-3493: stress.multi times out waiting on testers with blocked testers waiti ng on the same statement Changed ConcurrentCache.create() to match Clock.create() more closely. The patch basically makes ConcurrentCache.create() use ConcurrentHashMap.get() directly instead of going through ConcurrentCache.getEntry(), which may block until the identity has been set by another thread. Then create() fails immediately if the object already exists in the cache, also if another thread is in the process of inserting the object into the cache. Since this introduced yet another difference between find() and create() in findOrCreateObject(), I also followed ?\195?\152ystein's suggestion from his review of DERBY-2911 and split findOrCreateObject() into a number of smaller methods, which I think makes the code easier to follow. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ They all seem like bug fixes that would need to be merged to the new branch so unless I hear otherwise, I plan to cut the branch(es) from revision 635183. I plan to do this early on Monday (CET). Thanks, -- dt
