Hi Manjula!
I was able to fix the problem with linking the source-code, so now the
site I mentioned before shows correct and complete results.
To summarize and compare with your results:
OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY
--------------------------------------------------
all classes: 90% (1264/1397)
Method : 75% (16948/22513)
Block : 73% (479495/660441)
Line : 71% (100760/141054)
OVERALL STATS SUMMARY
total packages: 89
total executable files: 1280
total classes: 1397
total methods: 22513
total executable lines: 141054
So we see a couple of (general) differences:
1. In general you report higher numbers for the totals
2. In general I find higher numbers for coverage
Can this be explained by just the differences in our jvm's (as different
vendors) or should we investigate more?
For my numbers I did a little workaround regarding the source-code: I
used the source-code from the 10.4-branch and not the official 10.4.1.3
Thanks !
Henri
Manjula Kutty wrote:
Hi Henri
I ran suites.all. I used my derby_tests policy (Actually the one which
gives all permission). I ran it with jdk142, 15 and 16. I will be
linking the full report to the wiki.
Thanks
Manjula
On 5/6/08, *Henri van de Scheur* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Manjula Kutty wrote:
OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY
--------------------------------------------------
all classes: 87% (1226/1404) Method : 74% (16629/22556)
Block : 69% (486715/704201)
Line : 69% (101022.4/146764)
OVERALL STATS SUMMARY
total packages: 90
total executable files: 1286
total classes: 1404
total methods: 22556
total executable lines: 146764
--
Thanks,
Manjula.
Hi Manjula!
What testsuite did you use and which jvm-versions?
I used Emma to run with suitesAll on jvm1.4, jvm1.5 and jvm1.6
(both 32- and 64-mode). Results can be found here:
http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/10.4.1.3_RC/Emma.html
Unfortunately I have had some problems linking the source-code to
these reports, but I plan to do that within the next 24 hours (if
svn allows me....).
Thanks,
Henri
