Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Kathey,
Right now, I'm planning to back out BOOLEAN before the branch.
Hi Rick,
Does this mean the work already done for adding the BOOLEAN-type is not
appropriate for completion in 10.3 (or a later release)?
In case the work already done is to be discarded, can the reason(s)
behind this decision be (briefly) stated?
Thanks,
--
Kristian
Regards,
-Rick
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Like you I'm happy that Geir Magnusson is working the JCP issues and
I'm optimistic that the time line, which had been twisted into a
pretzel, can be straightened out. I'm not ready to propose an
alternative--but I expect to know more soon. Something along the
lines of your proposal would be very attractive.
I'm glad that you're comfortable with cutting a branch in early
August. Perhaps we could move the discussion forward to this topic
now. I know that several contributors still want to complete work on
features for 10.2. Does everyone feel comfortable with having those
features committed by August 10 so that we can cut a 10.2 branch then?
For BOOLEAN do you still plan back out that work right after the branch?
Relevant issues:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1029
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-984
