Rayson, some/most of us are looking for best performance AND best stability/scalability/tools/etc.
When I look for performance I usually go with Berkeley DB JE ;-) On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Rayson Ho <raysonlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:06 PM, bruehlicke <bruehli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It is a unconstructive question to ask. It depends on many >> requirements and situations. > > I guess I just got an unconstructive answer from you :-D > > I am trying to find out whether the benchmarks they used are fair, and > whether the Derby developers know that H2 is "faster". > > Even with unfair benchmarks that make H2 really shine, can't Derby > learn from H2?? > > And no, I don't have an application that I need to choose between Derby or H2. > > Rayson > > > > >> Is a car faster than an airplane ? Well >> if I have to go to the next corner shopping mall to pick up some milk >> your forgot, this is most likely the case. >> >> So try it out - and if you think one is faster than the other for your >> particular situation - go for it. For me the maturity, support, proven >> deployments and scalability together with features available are the >> key driving forces. >> >> B-) >> >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Rayson Ho <raysonlo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is it really true that H2 is faster than Derby?? >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Derby >>> >>> A year ago, I tried to remove the section that says that H2 is faster, >>> but someone always added it back into the article. And besides me, >>> seems like no one really care about the "Comparison to other embedded >>> SQL Java databases" section. >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Derby#Benchmarks >>> >>> Is it a well-known fact that H2 is always faster?? >>> >>> And there is also H2's benchmark page: >>> >>> http://www.h2database.com/html/performance.html >>> >>> Is it a fair comparsion?? >>> >>> Rayson >>> >> >
