I don't think that's the problem: 1. The same amount of heap is configured 2. I've checked with VisualVM and it uses much less than the provided memory(ca. 250mbyte vs. 1024mbyte heap).
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Bryan Pendleton <bpendleton.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've tried to figure out what the differences are between these two >> environments without luck. > > > Perhaps the amount of memory available to Derby is dramatically > different in the one case than in the other, and Derby is working > very hard to accomplish its tasks with insufficient memory? > > bryan > > -- Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? http://www.zylin.com/
