On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 00:41 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > Hi Drew, * > > drew schrieb: > > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 23:12 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> based on a SC decision to provide logos for external use without the > >> subline "The Document Foundation" I created a proposal: > >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Non-TDF_logos.png > >> > > > > One comment - request. > > > > If there is to be a 'can't change' license then it would by very nice to > > have one with only the word LibreOffice, particularly for the community > > supporter logo as the addition of the application icon, IMO, adds to > > much width to the overall look. > > I think we'll allow usage of the word alone (as it is already mentioned > in the Branding Guidelines) and provide such logos too. > > But I think we have to keep enough white space around the text to keep > it distinct from the surrounding. > > Do you think this is enough?
IMO yes. On white space generally- I've never had a problem with the white space requirements, IMO often more then the required amount makes a better overall look anyway. The only _problem_ I've had with the logo is due to the width overall, and then only when forced into a small size overall. That however is tough to avoid when the design is text based, and dropping 'The Document Foundation' line goes a long way towards mitigating that issue. Thanks for putting this together, Drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
