Hi Christoph, Vamsi, *, Am Montag, 6. Juni 2011, 22:58:25 schrieb christ...@dogmatux.com: (...) > > Just a quick thought - do we really need an additional logo for the site? > > Wouldn't it be better to make the LibO main branding a bit stronger? By > > the way, how will the site itself be called? > >
it mustn't be a different logo at all. I think it had to be something that make it clear for the user that it is the repository site and that it belongs to the LibreOffice-/TDF-Family. > > Instead of a site logo, how about putting emphasis on the single items? > > For example: at OOo we made the fault to confuse the users how > > extensions are visualized. On the extension site, we had some kind of > > yellow Sputnik, all the icons within LibreOffice/OOo feature a jigsaw > > puzzle piece. > > > > Concerning the latter, I think the metaphor is okay. So my proposal is to > > use a blue (LibO blue) puzzle piece for this sub-section. Anything > > different would be inconsistent with our software. Or, the other way > > round, we have the great chance to correct a mistake from the past :-) > > > > Same for the templates ... will omit that. Still, it is a phone keyboard In my opinion it is important that the logo and the layout of the site (colors etc.) shows the user, that he is on a resorce of TDF and that there is the repository for extensions and templates. I posted a request for a layout on the website-list. There seemed currently no reply to my posting. Regards, Andreas -- ## Developer LibreOffice ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows ## http://LibreOffice.org ## Support the Document Foundation (http://documentfoundation.org) ## Meine Seite: http://www.amantke.de -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
