2013/12/27 Cor Nouws <oo...@nouenoff.nl> > Hi Mirek, > > Mirek M. wrote (27-12-13 16:32) > > 2013/12/27 Mirek M. <maz...@gmail.com> > >> 2013/12/24 Cor Nouws <oo...@nouenoff.nl> > >> > >>> I agree. With applauding for the many improvements, but also with > >>> the criticism on the thumbnails size. > >>> > >>> - I see in 4.2.0 beta there are 10 thumbnails on one line. And > >>> room for 4 to 5 lines. Those thumbnails are a bit small. > >>> > >>> - In 4.2.0 RC1 there are 4 thumbnails on one line and only two > >>> lines visible. Really way too large. > >>> > >>> Something as 7 to 8 thumbnails on one line would be best, IMO. > >>> > >> > >> Keep in mind that: * The number of thumbnails per line depends on > >> the window size. * This window will usually be full-screen, given > >> that it transforms into modules. * At smaller sizes, the thumbnails > >> are much harder to make out. > > Yes, I did consider all those. > > >> Take a look at Stuart's screenshot: > >> > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4088188/StartCenter_1920x1200HD_fully_populated_18-thumbnails_with_vertical_scroll.jpg > . > >> The presentations are easy to make out, but the documents can be > >> hard to make out, even at this size. > > That looks as a reasonable compromise between what I see in beta2 and rc1. > > > Mirek M. wrote (27-12-13 16:41) > > > The thumbnails are there to be able to set apart documents at a glance, > so > > there's some need to be able to make out the basics, though it's true > that > > with documents, you'll mostly be looking at the layout and perhaps the > > title. > > My response obviously was triggered by using rc1 after beta2 :) > Larger is easer to read, of course. But at the size of rc1 I can almost > edit them :) (1366x768 usually full screen) But finding recent document > that are below #8 (number of recent documents counts to 25..) is a pita ;) > > > All these things said (talking about my recent messages, not just this > > one), though, I wouldn't mind it if the previews were limited to 180x180 > > instead of the current 256x256. > > Sounds interesting! > Is the screenshot above 180X180? >
No, I think it's still 256x256, just on a large monitor. > Was the size in beta2 90x90 or so ? > It was a smaller than 180x180, but I don't remember the exact size. > > thanks for your response! > Cor > > -- > - Cor Nouws > - http://nl.libreoffice.org > - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
