On 25/04/2018 15:37, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote: > How exactly is this confusing? We already denote the ISO-standardized > version of OOXML with the “Strict” moniker, don’t we?
Unfortunately, the "Strict" version does not exist in reality, but only on paper. Microsoft Office 2016 writes only one flavour of OOXML, which is Transitional (i.e. non standard), and adds the "Strict" XML string when you Save As ... OOXML Strict with Microsoft Office (which is definitely not enough to make it "Strict"). The only difference is in Excel files, as dates are saved as dates (and not as progressive numbers since January 1st, 1900), but also this is not enough to make it "Strict". -- Italo Vignoli - Marketing & PR email italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org mobile/signal +39.348.5653829 - skype italovignoli hangout/jabber italo.vign...@gmail.com The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint GPG Key ID - 0xAAB8D5C0 DB75 1534 3FD0 EA5F 56B5 FDA6 DE82 934C AAB8 D5C0 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted