For English, maybe. There's no guarantee that changing from Cancel to
Discard in other languages will be one word, or even close in length.

--Shahyar


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Jared Zimmerman <[email protected]>wrote:

> Pau has a good point if we keep the strings a single word when possible
> (language) the distraction should be minimized. Especially since we should
> try to do a quick but subtle fade between the two black text strings
> shouldn't be that distracting.
>
> Sent while mobile
>
> On Mar 6, 2014, at 12:50 AM, Pau Giner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure about changing the text.  That might be too
>> attention-grabbing.
>
>
> If changing the text makes the action more contextual, it tends to work
> well.
> We applied and tested with users similar approaches [1]. some examples are
> the Draft namespace prototypes (where "publish draft" turns into "save"
> once there are changes) and the translate extension (where possible
> outdated translations have "Confirm translation" as the initial action and
> it turns into "Save" when the user modifies the translation).
>
> A possible distraction can be produced if the change in text length has a
> big impact, but you can play with min-width to compensate that (giving some
> extra room to the button which is expected to grow). In this case, since we
> are talking about silent buttons, that is even less of a problem (compared
> to colourful primary action buttons).
>
>
> [1] Testing sessions for draft namespaces available at
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Draft_namespace/Usability_testing/Results
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Flaschen 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On 03/05/2014 12:33 PM, Jared Zimmerman wrote:
>>
>>> That's partly (but not strongly) why I think both should be quiet
>>> destructive. But since both would be quiet, either quiet neutral
>>> (cancel) or quiet destructive (discard) the user won't actually see a
>>> color change or appearance when they enter text.
>>>
>>
>> I think the idea of starting quiet neutral, and changing to quiet
>> destructive when they have (unsaved) changes, makes sense.  I agree it
>> shouldn't be too attention-grabbing, since quiet buttons are not visible
>> until hover/focus.
>>
>> I'm not sure about changing the text.  That might be too
>> attention-grabbing.
>>
>>
>>  For non-JS I'll say what I always say. We should have a graceful
>>> controlled degradation for these users. In this can they will see no
>>> change. eg. the button will always say cancel , and not change based on
>>> their actions.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I think this is fine.
>>
>> For the core edit page, I filed as https://bugzilla.wikimedia.
>> org/show_bug.cgi?id=62304 .  There is also a Flow one S filed at
>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62290
>>
>> Matt Flaschen
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Design mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pau Giner
> Interaction Designer
> Wikimedia Foundation
>  _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>
> _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>
>
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to