On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, at 22:38, Tomasz W. Kozlowski wrote: > Gryllida wrote: > > > That's what a browser form history is for. I am yet to see two users who > > would use the same edit summaries. > > https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roberto_Bautista-Agut&curid=2536768&diff=39020920&oldid=38563488 > https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%C5%81otwa&curid=7230&diff=39020894&oldid=39020311 > > Tomasz >
I tried the canned summaries gadget; it was obnoxious, as I have a habit of being quite verbose (when I change a date format, I link to a date format section of a style guide). I tend to abuse the wikilinks feature of the edit summaries. Odds are that if you make canned edit summaries, you could try to design it like browser form auto-complete, just so it is effectively the same thing, but server-side. Either 1) make it same for all (?? I don't think I'd find it useful, for the same reasons as the gadget), or 2) keep a history per account. But https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Discrimination_against_unregistered_contributors#Cookies_authentication comes to mind... Gryllida. _______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
