Thanks for the link. I'll have to take a look at it more closely on the weekend when I have more time.
Cheers, Selva --- Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to clarify that the Dashboard design in no > way precludes > filing and organization. In fact those are very > important aspects of > the Chandler design as outlined in the Virtuality > presentation I > posted to the list two months ago: > > http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/ > VirtualityPresentationSlides > > Chandler will provide Tagging, Faceting and > Organizing affordances in > ADDITION to Triaging.** Triaging is seen as a first > step to get rid > of the 80% of material that you actually don't need > to Tag, Facet or > Organize at all, whereas currently, in order to > maintain a tidy > Inbox, many people feel the need to perform the > rather onerous task > of filing every single email they receive. > > Also, since all of our collections are rule based, > we absolutely > intend to allow users to auto-triage, auto-tag, > auto-facet and auto- > organize items with rules. However, given that the > majority of email > users never create a single rule, we must first and > foremost > restructure the information architecture of the > client itself to help > people manually manage their information more > efficiently. And that > is the motivation behind the Dashboard design. > > Mimi > > **Actually it's better to think of Triaging, > Tagging, Faceting and > Organizing as different phases of a single > affordance (as per the > Software that adapts to your changing data needs in > the "What does > Chandler mean to me" thread.) > > On Oct 1, 2005, at 11:42 AM, Seth Johnson wrote: > > > > > > > selva r wrote: > > > >> > >> Hence, with respect to a two or three frame model > for > >> Dashboard as I had recently suggested, I would > suggest > >> we allow for a mechanism to view the Email Inbox > frame > >> by folder in addition to a general email InBox > view. > >> Any one whos subscribed to a list like > >> [email protected] (- which averages 30 to 80 > >> emails per day- ) in the past would probably > >> appreciate what Im talking about. > >> > > > > > > . . . or who subscribes to hundreds of email > lists, many of which > > may be high volume . . . > > > > > > Seth > > > > -- > > > > RIAA is the RISK! Our NET is P2P! > > http://www.nyfairuse.org/action/ftc > > > > DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders! > > > > New Yorkers for Fair Use > > http://www.nyfairuse.org > > > > [CC] Counter-copyright: > http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc > > > > I reserve no rights restricting copying, > modification or > > distribution of this incidentally recorded > communication. > > Original authorship should be attributed > reasonably, but only so > > far as such an expectation might hold for usual > practice in > > ordinary social discourse to which one holds no > claim of > > exclusive rights. > > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > > > Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" > mailing list > > > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design > > > > __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
