Yet another benchmark, glmark2, in a very recent core i5 client. Scores: No WM: 2058 marco --no-composite: 1894 compiz : 1878 metacity --no-composite: 742 xcompmgr: 716 marco --composite: 708 metacity --composite: 441
In an ideal world, gnome-flashback would support compiz first, then `metacity --no-composite` but with the speed of `marco --no-composite`. They're 4-5 times faster than the proposed `metacity --composite`!!! /me will definitely ask the Mate people if they still support `marco --no-composite`... ** Attachment added: "glmark2.zip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1566157/+attachment/4628575/+files/glmark2.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566157 Title: Metacity's compositing is too slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1566157/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
