Hi Alberts, I tried applying the latest 13 commits from the test-3-18 branch on top of Xenial's metacity.
If my benchmarks were correct, it made things even slower. glmark2 score: xenial-metacity --no-composite: 311 test-3-18-metacity --no-composite: 154 xenial-marco --no-composite: 902 I.e. now it's 6 times, rather than 3 times, slower than marco... Can we use marco instead? Doesn't it additionally have CSD support? Or, could end users of gnome-flashback-session decide to install and use marco instead of metacity without bumping into major issues? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566157 Title: Metacity's compositing is too slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1566157/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
