On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 09:53 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 14:47 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 21:29 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:47:12PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > > > > > Since the original announcement mail about gnome-power-manager, we have > > > > moved the mailing list to gnome.org, are now hosted on gnome.org, and am > > > > starting to integrate with other parts of the GNOME application stack. > > > > Lots of new functionality has been added, and lots of polish has been > > > > applied. See the screenshots area of my website[5] for some cool > > > > screenshots of the latest stuff in the 2-15 branch. > > > > > > I would like to see g-p-m fragmented into three parts. > > > > > > * A daemon with no GTK+ dependance that would be suitable for > > > cross-desktop use > > > * A capplet (this exists today) > > > * A notification area icon (libnotify dependance goes here) > > > > Umm, no. > > > > The IPC between these components would be horrific and over-complicated > > for no actual gain. KDE are quite happy with their own power management > > applications, and no KDE developer has ever mentioned to me that they > > would want such a cross-desktop daemon. > > Does their power management thing use DBus, > they use HAL if we're talking about kpowersave
> and > if so, do we share a common interface? I care > much less about shared code than about shared > interfaces. > HAL is the shared common interface. -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list