On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 20:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 20:52 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 17:56:50 +0000, Jaap Haitsma wrote: > > > On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 14:47 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > >> On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 21:29 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: > > >> > On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:47:12PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > [...] > > >> > I would like to see g-p-m fragmented into three parts. > > >> > > > >> > * A daemon with no GTK+ dependance that would be suitable for > > >> > cross-desktop use [...] > > >> Umm, no. > > [...] > > > So in my opinion it's not that difficult, or am I missing something? > > > > Well and there is something like this already in pbbuttons [...] > You can continue to use pbbuttonsd if you like it. We can discuss > pbbuttonsd if it is proposed for inclusion.
This is supposed to say it is nicely doable *if* necessary. I don't know whether doing it at this stage for g-p-m is necessary or not. But on the long run it is definitely beneficial to have a single daemon for all freedesktop's. Soeren. PS: FWIW, I would probably switch to g-p-m and add OSD support if I feel I like it. -- Sometimes, there's a moment as you're waking, when you become aware of the real world around you, but you're still dreaming. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list