Le lundi 17 juillet 2006, à 10:12, JP Rosevear a écrit : > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:58 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 08:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > And while there were almost no objections to Python, there are clearly > > > many objections to Mono. > > > > I used to have objections against the python bindings, but after those > > got splitup in pygtk, gnome-python, gnome-python-desktop and > > gnome-python-extras, I don't have big problems with it. > > > > Looking at mono, all of these bindings are in one package: gtk-sharp-2. > > I think, to get mono as accepted binding language, we should have a > > splitup similiar to the splitup that has been done to the python > > bindings. > > This is really just a packaging issue, on opensuse/SLED they are all > individual packages (glib-sharp, gtk-sharp, etc).
How do we deal with the tarballs on the ftp servers? (there's no packages there). We only want the supported bindings in http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/bindings/2.x/2.x.y/sources/ Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list