fre, 21 07 2006 kl. 17:57 -0500, skrev Shaun McCance: > On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 00:10 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > > lør, 22 07 2006 kl. 02:33 +1000, skrev Jeff Waugh: > > > * If Alex wants to adopt the GNOME release cycle and strategy for Tomboy, > > > that's *fantastic*... but we can approach that differently. > > > > Tomboy being largely feature complete and stable would need mostly > > maintenance, this is up to Alex to sign on for though - Ekiga e.g. > > doesn't follow the GNOME cycle religiously either so long as it works > > with the desktop we ship and doesn't fall into an unmaintained state > > Tomboy should be fine. > > > > Following the cycle is mostly about: > > * deploying bugfixes > > * adopting platform changes > > * adding required features > > > > And being sure that users actually get this supportable version of your > > software in hand. > > * letting translators translate, unless the developers > want to translate their program into 45 languages. > * letting documentation writers write documentation, > unless the developers want to do it. > > There are *many* advantages to a stable release cycle, and > a number of those reasons have to do with the fact that the > programmers are not the only people producing what we ship.
I feel ashamed now.. How could I forget translations when I'm on the Danish team - my bad. I'll go sit in a corner now - David _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list