Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > So, the attitude we can expect from a person whom wants to contribute > something to GNOME in terms of organisation and policies is to try and > understand the current organisation, policies and goals; and only after > that, proposing to change something (complete with a nice road map and > rationales for every point). > > Ciao, > Emmanuele. > > Hi, thanks for directions. :-) My main suggestion is a position of a Gnome Moderator. It's difficult to prove his importance with a roadmap since it is only possible to appeal to a common sense and imagination: graphs won't help. By the way, here is a good description: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forum_moderator
My next point is that Gnome and GTK+ should part their ways (like Qt and KDE which are separate entities). I tried to explain rationales in my letter: http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel-list@gnome.org/msg06771.html _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
