Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 14:20 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote: > > As far as I am concerned I'd like to drop any reports from 2.16 and > > below, but I see how that may be a little to aggressive. What about > > dropping reports from 2.14 and below? > > If there are no objections, I'll start with dropping bug-buddy reports > created with bug-buddy <=2.14 (meaning: GNOME versions before <=2.14) > starting Mon 9 April. I'll probably setup an [EMAIL PROTECTED] auto > responder which tells them to upgrade their GNOME to the latest version > available.
Given the length of Redhat, SuSE and Debian release cycles, this will just make bug-buddy useless for many stable users. Ideally you could detect their distribution and tell them to report the issue directly in the distribution's tracking system. BTW, I'm working on a non-GNOME-dependent replacement to bug-buddy, which will report crashes in the Debian BTS instead. In the future, it should save you the Debian-related bugs (if we can manage the number of bugs...) -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
