On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:24:57AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 19:41 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > > I can't speak for libxml++ maintainer, but given that libxml++ depends > > on Glib::ustring, it should stay at most in the bindings.\ > > That's a strange logic. External dependencies should be allowed to use, > for instance, glib. > > If libxml is removed from the GNOME Platform then libxml++ should be > removed too. (I'm the maintainer).
That's also a strange logic to me. libxml2 gets out of the GNOME platform because I think it comes with the OS and its updates are really OS related not GNOME releases related. If that's the case for libxml++ too then this makes sense, but I'm not sure it's true at this point. Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list