On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:07:04AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 04:41 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:24:57AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 19:41 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > > > > I can't speak for libxml++ maintainer, but given that libxml++ depends > > > > on Glib::ustring, it should stay at most in the bindings.\ > > > > > > That's a strange logic. External dependencies should be allowed to use, > > > for instance, glib. > > > > > > If libxml is removed from the GNOME Platform then libxml++ should be > > > removed too. (I'm the maintainer). > > > > That's also a strange logic to me. libxml2 gets out of the GNOME platform > > because I think it comes with the OS and its updates are really OS related > > not GNOME releases related. If that's the case for libxml++ too then this > > makes sense, but I'm not sure it's true at this point. > > The GNOME Platform Bindings are meant to wrap the GNOME Development > Platform.
<irony> Oh I though it was about helping GNOME developers write applications in other languages than C, sorry I misunderstood the ultimate goal ! </irony> Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list