On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:28:21AM -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > > I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the > > > gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously, > > > releasing Nautilus with too many or some big regressions is not a good > > > plan. > > > > More for release-team to decide, not d-d-l. Devs should code. > > Bzzt. Also wrong answer. r-t's role is in large part to reflect the
I don't like that tone. I think it is the right thing and I'm not answering a question. > will of devs, so devs should definitely be discussing how to > prioritize and deal with this problem. Huge threads on d-d-l are generally useless. Direct communication with relevant dev is far more efficient. Last message from me in this thread. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
