On Feb 12, 2008 8:53 AM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 08:42 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be > > > ready for GNOME 2.22 without regressions. > > > > > > Why aren't we talking about punting it until GNOME 2.23/24? We've never > > > allowed this kind of thing before - punting would be entirely normal. > > > > We once delayed > > delays are generally very disruptive to other projects (distros, mostly) > who have aligned with our schedule. Reverting would have to be really > impossible.
It isn't just that they are impossible, it is that they are also time-consuming- you have to separate them out from all the other changes made during the cycle, and that is not effort-free. If the delays are that big a deal to the distros, then they should lend some QA and development resources to the final sprint. Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
