On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le jeudi 04 décembre 2008, à 17:00 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit : > > Is above acceptable? > > The current situation is a dead-end, so I'm all for moving, even if we > lose some stuff.
Yeah, but I need to know: * what priority should the missing stuff get (to determine order of work) * what is critical (e.g. affects GNOME release if missing for more than at most 4 weeks) Missing functionality ok, causing 2.26 to suck is not. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
