On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:56 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Cosimo Cecchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - patch review status > > Maybe time to investigate Review Board or the like?
I haven't tried that kind of programs, but I think that any solution for reviewing patches has to be tightly tied to bugzilla itself (and I personally quite like the current solution, though I understand it's not very handy for big changes with many diffs), as that seems an easy way to me to attract users to jump in and contribute a patch. > > - simple-dup-finder > > Suggest we move crashes out of Bugzilla and into a separate database > (like Socorro). Bugzilla should only be for hand-written input from > technical people. Technically, bug-buddy is already capable of creating minidumps and push them to a crash.gnome.org server, and this would be great indeed, but AFAICT it requires a lot of coordination between us and distributions to provide: - a way for distributors to automatically push debug information to a centralized server for every package/update. - an unified way to get the version of a package, as distributors often ship two or more updates for the same upstream version. To be honest, I like more the way Ubuntu handles this, i.e. has its own crash server and pushes upstream only the good/unique traces. Cheers, Cosimo _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list